Research on the Development Level of China's Agricultural Rural Modernisation Based on Delphi, Entropy Weight and Topsis Methods

Authors

  • Yijie Zeng
  • Ying Cai
  • Mohan Tang
  • Haoluo Dan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/qbqevr34

Keywords:

Modernisation of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Weighting, Integrated Assessment.

Abstract

This paper proposes a comprehensive assessment model through the Delphi, entropy weight and Topsis methods to address the complexity and diversity of China's agricultural and rural modernisation development. Firstly, the relative weights of each indicator in the modernisation of agriculture and rural areas were determined through expert surveys and weighted averages, and consistency tests were conducted to verify the credibility of the results. Secondly, the use of the entropy weight method is detailed, where the weights are determined by calculating the information entropy value of the indicators, and the final weight results are normalised. Further, the application of the Topsis method in assessing the development level of agricultural and rural modernisation in each province and city is described, and the comprehensive scores of each region are derived and graded by comparing the distances from the ideal solution and the negative ideal solution. Finally, the degree of realisation of agricultural and rural modernisation in China's provinces and cities is assessed and analysed based on the scores, demonstrating the differences and trends in the modernisation process in different regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Xie Jiali, Zhang Han, Wang Feng, et al. Multi-scale spatial characterisation and evaluation of rural settlements [J]. Mapping and Spatial Geographic Information, 2024, 47 (06): 4-7.

[2] H. Zhang,G.Y. Liu. Evaluation of rural financial service satisfaction in Linxia Prefecture based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [J]. Gansu Agriculture, 2024, (06): 75-80.

[3] QIN Yuhan, FAN Yaochun, ZHANG Xiangnan,et al. Hygienic evaluation of a rural drinking water safety project in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. China Health Engineering, 2024, 23 (03): 313-315+319.

[4] Qiu Yanzhao, Du Tingting, Gu Yaqi, et al. Construction of evaluation system for standardised management of rural water supply in Beijing [J/OL]. Beijing Water, 1-7[2024-07-08].

[5] A Tianyu, Luo Guangfei, Chen Dejiao. Evaluation study on the current situation of rural residents' participation in sports activities in Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province based on factor analysis and BP neural network[C]// Shaanxi Sports Science Society, Shaanxi Student Sports Association. Abstract collection of papers of the second Shaanxi sports science conference (Topic IX). College of Physical Education and Sports, Baoji College of Arts and Science; 2024: 8.

[6] Wang X. Rural Habitat Environment Evaluation Based on the Theory of Human Settlement--Taking Pan Village as an Example [J]. Shanghai Arts and Crafts, 2024, (02): 96-99.

[7] HOU Mingyan, REN Hailin. Analysis of Influencing Factors and Quality Evaluation of "Four Good Rural Roads" Traffic Construction Project--Taking Henan Province as an Example [J]. Jiangxi Science, 2024, 42 (03): 574-581+638.

[8] Sun Lei, Zhang Liya, Chen Dongming,et al. Impact of social networks on the evaluation of home care for the elderly in rural and urban areas of Henan Province [J]. China Rural Health, 2024, 16 (06): 24-27.

[9] Zou S. N., Gan H. F., Zhang W., et al. Characteristics and risk assessment of EDCs in water bodies in rural areas around a landfill in Chongqing [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 37 (03): 58-63.

[10] WANG Jiancheng, YU Chuyi. Research on the evaluation of regional soft environment of rural e-commerce in the context of rural revitalisation [J]. Shanxi Agricultural Economics, 2024, (11): 103-106.

Downloads

Published

05-11-2024

How to Cite

Zeng, Y., Cai, Y., Tang, M., & Dan, H. (2024). Research on the Development Level of China’s Agricultural Rural Modernisation Based on Delphi, Entropy Weight and Topsis Methods. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 11, 294-300. https://doi.org/10.62051/qbqevr34